Unpopular Opinion: Selling Your Soul For Fame and Fortune, Exploring The "Victims" of Sean 'Diddy' Combs

Let's be real about some of the victims being thrown in our faces!

First, I want to say hello to my readers. It’s been a while since I’ve written on this platform. I have been focusing on quick content via YouTube livestreams and videos. It’s been a convenient way to stay engaged and still LIFE. With that said, I still find time to stay current on events in Satan’s world. One event that has captured my attention is Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs’ Rico Trial. I tried hard not to commit too much YouTube content on the matter because at the root of it is sadism, which was protected until the asset, which in this case is Diddy, fell out of line. Many would consider the entire Comb dynasty to be an American success. You have to be calculated, willing, and connected to reach the heights that Diddy has achieved in the music industry, especially as a Black man. Let’s face it, Black men are not the top executives dominating the music industry. He has arguably helped establish many people in industry or outside industry influence. This article is not to glorify the grotesque, inhuman, and frankly demonic character that Diddy has been portrayed as; it is simply to face the reality of his case, which is no real case in my mind. People were paid to participate in satanic sex rituals and they consented by taking money; including the artists and staff.

Dawn Richard from Diddy’s all female group Danity Kane testified to the horrible person that Diddy is, threats that were made to her, and the abuse she witnessed towards Cassie. She was asked by the defense why did she reach out to Diddy after separating from him to continue working with him after all of that, and of course the root was career ambitions. Please do not think me insensitive to people with ambitions or even victims of abuse. I have ambitions, but I am not willing to endure just anything to achieve them, some people will.

As of yet, the prosecution has failed to prove sex trafficking and organized trafficking, which would result in federal RICO charges. The private “FREAK OFF” parties were said to be ritualistic and consentual to the extent that many people claiming to be victims of them, were also enriched. It was also alluded by the star witness Cassie Ventura that the events were scripted to the performance requirements of the participants in many ways. Thusfar, we have heard character witness accounts that continue to paint Diddy as a controlling, violent, and organized manipulator who lure people with his status into committing humiliating acts or suffering extreme and violent consequences for not falling in line with demands or expectations. As you listen to the testimony, it is clear that many of the so-called victims of Diddy, were at their own roots self-interest. Many have accused me of victim shaming, but when of think about what some of these people were willing to do to even be eclisped by Diddy’s access and success, you start to conclude that maybe they were victims of their own choices and wants, and divorced their sense of pride and dignity the moment they consented to dealing with Diddy.

As I have said in many articles, this is Satan’s world. You don’t go certain heights without being willing to divorce many aspects of morality, respect, and dignity. 1 Timothy 6:10 “For the love of money is the root of all sorts of evil.” Yes, when you love money or covet it with great passion, the Devil knows this and so does his agents. Loving money makes a person weak at their core and suseptable to all kinds of profane things. This is REALITY. People without the governance of the Most High and removed from his protection are desperate and do desperate things. Everyone who chose to deal with diddy, especially after the 2000 should have known what it was. Diddy was a devil before Cassie met him. He was giving evil bossman for years. It’s like interviewing for a job and the hiring manager is a Class A Asshole. You pick up on this in the interview and even though the job is perfect, the management is horrible. Do you take the job knowing what you know or do yu walk away and let God lead you to better peace? It’s a tough question depending on how reliant we are on ourselves and not God.

The prosecution’s star witness, Cassie Ventura, was set to be the ultimate destroyer of Diddy’s character. To me, there seems to be a huge reliance on Cassie’s victimhood and the narrative that Diddy has a sadistic side that, although immoral to many reasonable people, is NOT a crime. Paying people to perform and engage in satanic role laying and sex rituals is not a crime. People can argue the abuse of multiple people, but the question remains, how informed and consentual were the parties involved in the conversations and actions in question?It is arguable that Diddy and Hugh Heffner threw the same kind of parties. Hef was never accused of Sex trafficking. The difference between Hugh Heffner and Diddy is how they chose to treat women. Hugh Heffner made sure that the Playboy Mansion was a safe place for women. Diddy’s Bad Boy Entertainment parties were clearly not, and this was known in social circles. I put this point on the table because Cassie herself admitted to sex cultism and rituals being apart of Diddy’s parties. Obviously, the devil will inspire HIS people to do all sorts of profane things, hence they will always have shameful consequences. Cassie chose to stay and engage because there was an advantage. He choice led to her shaming herself and others! Yes, there was a man suing both Diddy and Cassie.

Cassie like many of the other “victims of Diddy” is a victim of her own ambitions. She knew what it meant to be with Diddy and without Diddy. She endured that horrible man not out of love all the time, but for thirst to be in a lime light that for her, was inevitably limited without Diddy. Cassie did not, and would not have had a lasting career nor visibility without Diddy. It’s not all because Diddy had control because she was signed to his label, it really is a matter of talent longevity, which she DID NOT HAVE. Cassie was a shelf-life talent and the only hits that I recall from her released on Bad Boy. My theory with Cassie is that she understood her career limits early on without Diddy, so she made sure she had a spot in his life outside of that to keep a financial hedge. Cassie sacrificed herself to be a kept woman by a narssistic monster who's reputation always preceded him. For more on my theory about Cassie, check out my lastest live stream on YouTube.

I am not a legal expert, but many legal rulings fall in the space of what a “reasonable person would believe.” I do not reasonably believe that Diddy is guilty of Sex trafficking in the context that the prosecution is trying to narrate. Their star witness has testified, and text messages indicate that Cassie and others had more control in their decision to be involved with Diddy and the situation than led on. I have long suspected that Cassie is more out for revenge because Diddy was with her all those years and she couln’t be his bottom bitch. The late Kim Porter was. Kim was the one who Diddy felt worthy enough to have his kids. Diddy did not want Cassie to be a mother of his children. She was with the man for over 10 years (notably OFF and ON), and he would not allow her to have his child and several interviews and communications shared in the case indicates that she wanted to have his children. He had children with other women. She competed for his time with other women, and was willing to do that.

When people talk about “selling your soul” in this world, I need people to understand that Cassie is a perfect example. You can’t play in the Devil’s playground and expect to be playing with high morality and ethics. Reasonable people know this, desperate people will ignore this. Many of the people dealing with Diddy knew what it was and still chose to deal with him because of a benefit. I hear Stockholme Syndrone being used as an excuse for why people like Cassie stuck around a monster, I don’t buy it. Again, many of these people are victims of their own choices.

I want to be clear, I don’t not think Diddy is an innocent guy being set up by the feds. I think he is a burned asset that was protected by the feds up until the point that he had too much power and influence, and he sued that alcohol machine and won for millions maybe close to a billion. The situation behind that was sus…and I think that started this cycle of taking Diddy down.

What do you think?